| Stand-alone PV power systems (off-grid) | home
> basics of pv
> Last updated: 4 April 2002 |
For many developing countries, where the electricity grid is largely confined to the main urban areas, and where a substantial proportion of the rural population does not have access to most basic energy services, PV is widely regarded today as the best - and least expensive - means of providing many of the services that are lacking. Based on minimum energy requirements to provide basic energy services to every individual in the developing world, the corresponding potential for PV is estimated to be 16 GW (approximately 15 W per capita).
PV modules can be used for (see also table for examples of these applications):
| Agriculture |
• water pumping, irrigation • electric fencing for livestock and range management |
| Community |
• water pumping, desalination and purification systems • lighting for schools and other community buildings |
| Domestic |
• lighting, enabling studying, reading, income-producing activities and general increase in living standards • TV, radio, and other small appliances • water pumping |
| Healthcare |
• lighting for wards, operating theatre and staff quarters • medical equipment • refrigeration for vaccines • communications (telephone, radio communications systems) • water pumping • security lighting |
| Small enterprises |
• lighting systems, to extend business hours and increase productivity • power for small equipment, such as sewing machines, freezers, grain grinders, battery charging • lighting and radio in restaurants, stores and other facilities |
Photovoltaic power systems are exceptionally modular, which not only provides for easy transportation and rapid installation, but also enables easy expansion if power requirements increase. PV systems for stand-alone applications may comprise some or all of the following basic components:
The solar PV generating equipment has no moving parts, which on the whole keeps maintenance requirements to a minimum and leads to long service lifetimes. The modules themselves are typically expected to operate for about twenty years, and should not require much more than the occasional cleaning to remove deposits of dirt. The majority of the other components - referred to as the Balance of Systems (BOS) - are generally serviceable for ten or more years if simple preventative maintenance measures are followed. Batteries, which are commonly required for most off-grid applications except water pumping, are currently the "weak-link" in the PV system and will typically need replacement every five years or so.
It is essential that storage batteries, and indeed all system components are of an acceptable quality. Where PV systems have failed in the past for technical reasons, it has generally been due to bad system design and/or poor selection of BOS components, rather than to failure of a PV module. As a result, considerable international research efforts are presently directed towards improving performance of BOS components.
[ Top ]
Like any such commodity, the total purchase price of a PV system is based on all inherent costs of producing the individual components, transporting these to the site and installing them. There may also be associated costs of designing and engineering the system and purchasing land - particularly for large-scale or one-off projects.
However, there are many other factors to consider:
As an example, a small domestic lighting system to power two or three fluorescent tubes would typically be in the order of 50 W, and would cost perhaps USD 500, whereas a solar photovoltaic vaccine refrigerator might require a 200 W array, bringing the total price of the system to around USD 5000.
Thus PV systems are an attractive option in rural areas where no grid-connection is available, though simple payback terms, because of its high capital costs, PV can often appear unattractive. However, using life-cycle costing, which accounts for all fuel and component replacement costs incurred over the life of the system, PV often compares favorable with the alternatives, which tend to have lower initial costs, but incur significantly greater operating costs.
Displacing conventional technologies with photovoltaic systems can bring various positive effects, which are difficult to quantify in direct financial terms, but which nonetheless offer significant economic and social benefits. For instance, in comparison to traditional kerosene lamps, PV can provide better lighting levels, enabling educational and income generating activities to continue after dark with reduced risk of fire and avoidance of noxious combustion fumes. The World Health Organization has noted that PV offers a more reliable refrigeration service than other power supply options. This has resulted in increased efficacy of stored vaccines, which in turn has helped to reduce mortality rates. Such factors must be considered when PV is compared to the alternatives even though the cost benefits are not easy to assess.
[ Top ]
Hybrid systems can also be sensible approach in situations where occasional demand peaks are significantly higher than the base load demand. It makes little sense to size a system to be able to meet demand entirely with PV if, for example, the normal load is only 10% of the peak demand. By the same token, a diesel generator-set sized to meet the peak demand would be operating at inefficient part-load for most of the time. In such a situation a PV-diesel hybrid would be a good compromise.
[ Top ]